So chocolate's good for you claims a Professor Oompa-Loompa... Anyone bored with the constant contradictions coming from supposedly qualified scientists? What next? Cheese n onion crisps healthier than fruit? Vodka better than water if you're suffering from piles on a Tuesday? I want an impartial obudsman to rate all 'scientific' verdicts with a likely to be contradicted tomorrow rating. Five tubs of Stork SB would be the top rating, a punnet of blueberries the lowest.
Still afforded myself a chuckle at the piece referring to "chocolate offenders". Is that like a Marmite muncher?Statistics: Posted by Bovine Juice — Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:19 am
]]>